I was finally able to watch the new HBO documentary about birding, Birders: The Central Park Effect, and I just want to say that it was lovely. It's honest about birding and birders, it's environmental without being preachy, it's celebratory and it's fun. It's basically the opposite of The Big Year, and, unlike that movie, it made me want to get outside and find some birds.
I've been engaging in some debate in the comment section of 10,000 Birds regarding an article about the movie written by Laura Helmuth that appeared on Slate. I wrote most of those comments before even seeing the movie (not usually a good idea), but after watching it I feel even more strongly that Helmuth's piece was petty, unnecessary and sensationalist. You can read my comments on there if you're interested, but my overall point is that Franzen echoes sentiments expressed by several others in the film, and if you leave Birders: The Central Park Effect thinking about anything other than how much you wish it were May 15, you've really missed out.
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Birders: The Central Park Effect
Monday, July 16, 2012
Birds At Large: The New York Times
The most shamefully-satisfying quirk of birders is pointing out bird-related mistakes in popular culture or media. We take a perverse pride in our mock-outrage when - for example - we see movie's shot of a bald eagle accompanied by the screaming call of a red-tailed hawk. It's a phenomenon I like to point out from time to time in these Birds At Large posts.
While the targets of these posts are frequently hurried advertisers or unconcerned sound-effects men, no one is immune. Not even the New York Times, that pillar of "respectable journalism." Reprinted below is a screencap from a July 13, 2012 story the Times did on a new HBO movie called Birders: The Central Park Effect. Notice anything amiss (click to enlarge)?
Yup, the bird in the lower left isn't the Northern mockingbird as identified in the caption, but a gray catbird.
I don't know what lesson to take from this: I could bemoan the quality of journalism in the world today; I could offer an electronic clap-on-the-back to beleagured ad-men out there and tell them they're not alone in their bird-identification-related challenges; or I could just offer-up a high five to the blogosphere (likely half-swung and mistimed, because we're uncoordinated nerds) for pointing out an error in the great and mighty Times.
Or I could just get back work.
UPDATE: The caption has been corrected. I should also point out that the documentary has been getting great reviews, so go check it out.
Labels: birds at large, new york times
Saturday, July 14, 2012
Birding Is Like Real-Life Pokemon - And We Could Market It To Kids That Way
I often get asked what drew me to birding. Other outdoor pursuits like hunting or fishing or snowmobiling don't seem to require an explanation for participation, but people are perplexed by birding. You just go and look at them? Have you always wanted to fly? Are you some sort of scientist?
No, I'm not a scientist. The reasons why I love birding are many, but the "goal" of it - as I explain it to those inquiring minds - is "to see all the different kinds of birds there are."
"You mean like Pokemon?" One of my delightfully-nerdish friends responded. "You've 'Gotta Catch 'em All?'"
Now, I don't know anything about Pokemon and didn't know what the hell she was talking about. But you know what? Birding is a LOT like a real life version of Pokemon - a worldwide entertainment sensation that is played by, like, a billion kids. Making that connection explicit to the kids of today - and to the young adults who've outgrown Pokemon's demographic - may be the ticket to get a lot more people participating in and caring about birding.
Pokemon started in 1996 as a video game for Nintendo's Game Boy (n00b alert - I'll be cribbing from Wikipedia for this paragraph). The game's creator, Satoshi Tajiri-Oniwa, was inspired by his childhood passion of collecting insects. The thrust of the game is that characters named Trainers walk around in a landscape hoping to encounter - and then capture - wild creatures called Pokemon. Other stuff happens (apparently) once you have these guys captured, but seeking out all the different iterations of Pokemon is the focus.
Seems like an opportunity to me. The "nature and environment" aspect of birding is essential, but I am still most attracted to the adventure of it. I think kids might be too, and if we can draw the comparisons. There are lots of organizations out there who are encouraging young people to start birding, maybe connecting birding to this Pokemon phenomenon is a good idea. Who knows, but at the very least, if a kid asks you why you like birding so much, just say Birding - Gotta Catch 'Em All!
Monday, July 2, 2012
How To Make A "Where I've Birded" Map Using Your eBird Data
I've always wanted a map showing just the areas I've birded, but didn't know how to get one. LONG STORY SHORT: I figured it out. Check it:
Want one? Here's what I did:
- Go to eBird > My eBird > Manage My Locations
- Make sure you hit "Show All" in the lower right so all of your locations are on one page
- Select all the text, and copy it into an Excel spreadsheet
- Delete the "in my locs?" "Type" and "# checklists" columns (and any other stray stuff that got in there).
- Make sure you have "Location" "Country" "State/Province" and "County" as Row 1 in your spreadsheet, or else insert a new column and add them. It'll look something like this:
- Go to www.BatchGeo.com
- Copy your spreadsheet into the big "paste here" box at the BatchGeo homepage.
- Go to Validate & Set Options > Advanced Options and make sure that "Enable clustering for high density markers" is NOT checked.
- Make the map! Check it out!
Labels: birding, ebird, Google, google maps, lifehack